Skip to content
General Program
Panel information
In-Person Participant info
Online Participant info
IN-CONFERENCE EXCURSION REGISTRATION
Support IASC
  • About the Conference
    • Welcome & Introduction
    • Conference Theme & Sub-themes
    • Accepted Panels
    • Information for Online Participants
    • Pre-conference workshops
    • Organizers
    • Sponsors
    • Hosting institutions
    • Elinor Ostrom Award
    • Contact us
  • Information for Online Participants
  • Visas
    • Visa Information
    • IASC membership
  • Schedules & guidelines
    • General Program
    • Accepted Panels grouped in 12 sub-themes
    • Author Index
    • Important Dates
    • Conference Venue
  • Excursions
    • In-Conference Excursions — Thursday June 19th, 2025
    • Post-Conference Excursions — June 21 – 22, 2025
  • Fees, Travel, Food & Lodging
    • Conference Registration Fees
    • Travel
    • Food at the Conference
    • Participant Lodging
  • About the Conference
    • Welcome & Introduction
    • Conference Theme & Sub-themes
    • Accepted Panels
    • Information for Online Participants
    • Pre-conference workshops
    • Organizers
    • Sponsors
    • Hosting institutions
    • Elinor Ostrom Award
    • Contact us
  • Information for Online Participants
  • Visas
    • Visa Information
    • IASC membership
  • Schedules & guidelines
    • General Program
    • Accepted Panels grouped in 12 sub-themes
    • Author Index
    • Important Dates
    • Conference Venue
  • Excursions
    • In-Conference Excursions — Thursday June 19th, 2025
    • Post-Conference Excursions — June 21 – 22, 2025
  • Fees, Travel, Food & Lodging
    • Conference Registration Fees
    • Travel
    • Food at the Conference
    • Participant Lodging
Panel 2. 3. Relationality and the Climate Commons: Understanding, Feeling, Connecting, and Working with Others

Session 2. 3. A.

ZOOM
YOUR LOCAL TIME:
Wednesday, June 18, 2025 10:00 AM – 12:00 PM Campus Center 162
Can Relationship Quality Influence the Collective Management of Common Pool Resources?
in-person
Marcela Brugnach1, Dimitri Dubois2, and Stefano Farolfi3
1Basque Centre for Climate Change - BC3, Spain, 2CEE-M, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, INRAE, SupAgro, France, 3UMR G-Eau, CIRAD, France

Relationships are a fundamental aspect of our social lives. As relational beings, we have evolved to connect with others, and the quality of these connections significantly influences our emotions, thoughts, and behaviors. However, a key question remains: can the quality of these relationships also impact how we collectively manage common pool resources (CPRs)? To address this, we developed an analytical framework to measure relationship quality within groups, focusing on emotional, perceptual, and closeness-related aspects experienced by group members. Through controlled social experiments, we tested whether the quality of relationships within groups affects CPR management. We manipulated relational quality via cooperative, competitive, and individual effort tasks, followed by a CPR game. Our results indicate that the quality of relationships significantly influences resource management. Positive perceptions of self and others’ behaviors, along with a sense of engagement and closeness, led to lower CPR extractions, while negative emotional states and perceptions resulted in higher resource uptake. These findings underscore the actionable role of relationships in CPR management, identifying relational quality as a crucial determinant of collective action and advocating for fostering high-quality connections to improve CPR outcomes.

Perspective-taking, Social Connection, Norms and Prosocial Behaviour in Natural Resource Management. a Field Study.
in-person
Juan-Felipe Ortiz-Riomalo1, David Ramírez-Ramón2, Stefanie Engel1, and Ann-Kathrin Koessler1
1Department of Environmental Economics, Osnabrück University, Germany, 2London School of Economics, UK

Addressing pressing social-environmental challenges requires the involvement and connection of interdependent actors with varying perspectives. Inducing perspective-taking can heighten other-regarding considerations and actions in favour of socially desirable outcomes in such situations. By encouraging decision-makers to consider broader perspectives, perspective-taking can foster concern for the well-being or expectations of others and/or for upholding personal and social norms. As a result, perspective-taking can compel prosocial behaviour. In this presentation, we draw on an extensive literature review and behavioural data obtained from fieldwork to explore how perspective-taking alters individuals' assessments of decision situations. Specifically, we examine how perspective-taking induces decision-makers to connect with, appreciate, and feel compelled to address others' needs when feasible and convenient (i.e., helping is within the realm of possibilities and not detrimental to their well-being). Our data comprises the behaviour of 206 farmers in a Peruvian watershed who learned through videos or field trips about the watershed's social and ecological conditions and interactions. A subset of these downstream farmers was asked to consider the perspectives of farmers living and working upstream while undertaking this learning activity.

Relationality and the Commons: Theory and Practice
in-person
Raul Lejano1 and Wing Shan Kan2
1New York University / Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, 2Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong

The relational view moves beyond the ontological notion of the autonomous ego, deciding on self-interested versus cooperative behavior, to that of connected beings --i.e., from cogito ergo sum to curae ergo sum (we care therefore we are). We present the relational theory of collective action and proceed to sum up some of the supporting evidence that has arisen over decades. And just as connectedness can foster collective action, we note how disconnectedness lies at the origins of environmental injustice. We then spend the rest of the talk on implications for managing the commons. Relationality provides us with new strategies for engendering collective behavior. These strategies are not meant to exclude other, more conventional institutional routes to sustainable governance of the commons but, rather, can be employed in concert with other mechanisms. We reflect on the significance of the relational perspective on these critical times and pose the question, "How do we motivate busy urbanites to care for melting glaciers half a world away?"

Frozen Commons for Addressing Climate Change by Converging Different Ways of Knowing
in-person
Vera Kuklina1, Andrey Petrov2, Shauna BurnSilver3, Nikolay Shiklomanov1, John Marty Anderies3, Leah Shaffer3, and Pauline Mnev1
1The George Washington University, United States, 2University of Northern Iowa, United States, 3Arizona State University, United States

The cryosphere is rapidly transforming due to climate change, with a shortening ice season, thawing permafrost, and glacial retreat becoming increasingly prevalent. These changes contribute to "Arctic amplification," causing the region to warm four times faster than the rest of the world. Ice has historically been a key indicator of climate change, and the Earth is becoming less 'frozen.' The cryosphere is critical for global climate stability and human populations. Rockstrom et al. (2024) recently identified the Arctic Cryosphere as a planetary commons, spanning national and supranational boundaries. Unlike conventional global commons, the Arctic has been populated for millenia, particularly by Indigenous Peoples. We urgently call for treating Arctic ice, snow, and permafrost as a critical planetary commons – a collectively governed common pool resource important at the planetary scale. Sustaining these frozen commons requires engagement from diverse actors and diverse ways of knowing at local, regional, national, and global levels, extending beyond nation-to-nation decision-making. Building on experience from Interior Alaska and northern Mongolia, this presentation highlights the importance of the concept of frozen commons for current discussions about sustainability and resilience of complex systems. We argue that bringing perspectives, amplifying voices, and elevating ethics of care for human and non-human relations in historically marginalized communities, such as Indigenous Peoples and nomadic herders in decision making and planning efforts is necessary to address climate change in a just and equitable way.

  • General Program
  • Panel Schedule Oral Presentations
  • Poster Presentations
  • IASC 2025 Social System Map
  • IASC 2025 Slack Workspace
  • Teamup Calendar (also see below in your local time)
  • General Program
  • Panel Schedule Oral Presentations
  • Poster Presentations
  • IASC 2025 Social System Map
  • IASC 2025 Slack Workspace
  • Teamup Calendar (also see below in your local time)

About the Conference

Welcome & Introduction

Conference theme & sub-themes

Online Components

Pre-conference workshops

Organizers

Sponsors

Hosting Institutions

Elinor Ostrom Award

Contact Us

Visas, registration & payments

Visa Information

IASC Membership

Registration

Schedules & Guidlines

Important Dates

Call for Contributions

Panels in Progress

Conference Venue

Conference Excursions

In-Conference Excursions

Post-Conference Excursions

Fees, Travel, Food & Lodging

Conference Registration Fees

Travel

Food at the Conference

Participant Lodging

Facebook-f X-twitter Linkedin

© 2025 | Privacy & Cookies Policy

Made with 🤟🏻 by Pfister Lab