Action around climate change poses perhaps the most daunting collective action problem for the commons. The issue transcends institutional boundaries, cuts across all scales of analysis (individual, community, nation, globe), and poses free rider problems encompassing multiple generations. The literature has proposed a number of institutional pathways for engendering collective action, including state-centered, market-based, and communitarian modes of organization. These institutional models trigger collective action through mechanisms involving individual rationality, social pressure, reciprocity, and others. However, in recent years, there has emerged another, underutilized pathway for collective action –relationality. Through social networks, connections across individuals and groups bring about pro-environmental action through mechanisms involving cognitive and emotional pathways (e.g., feeling empathy, caring for others). We will review, first, the conceptual basis for the relational model of collective action and, secondly, present a number of case studies that provide evidence for its activation in situations surrounding the climate commons.
Related References:
Brugnach et al. (2021). Relational quality and uncertainty in common pool water management. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 15188.
Lejano,R. (2023). Caring, Empathy, and the Commons. Cambridge University Press.
Ortiz-Riomalo,J.F. et al. (2021). Inducing perspective-taking for prosocial behaviour in natural resource management. JEEM, 110, 102513.
Relationships are a fundamental aspect of our social lives. As relational beings, we have evolved to connect with others, and the quality of these connections significantly influences our emotions, thoughts, and behaviors. However, a key question remains: can the quality of these relationships also impact how we collectively manage common pool resources (CPRs)? To address this, we developed an analytical framework to measure relationship quality within groups, focusing on emotional, perceptual, and closeness-related aspects experienced by group members. Through controlled social experiments, we tested whether the quality of relationships within groups affects CPR management. We manipulated relational quality via cooperative, competitive, and individual effort tasks, followed by a CPR game. Our results indicate that the quality of relationships significantly influences resource management. Positive perceptions of self and others’ behaviors, along with a sense of engagement and closeness, led to lower CPR extractions, while negative emotional states and perceptions resulted in higher resource uptake. These findings underscore the actionable role of relationships in CPR management, identifying relational quality as a crucial determinant of collective action and advocating for fostering high-quality connections to improve CPR outcomes.
© 2025 | Privacy & Cookies Policy