Water Governance had an important place in Elinor Ostrom’s research. This panel, organised by the Working Group in Water Governance at Ostrom Workshop, explores self-governing irrigation systems from a polycentric approach as well as taking other interdisciplinary approaches. This panel focuses on how collaboration is fostered and negotiation amongst various levels of governance - from individual users and communities, to non-governmental agencies and state institutions takes place. The panel includes broadly successful cases of self-governing water management as well as raises criticism where it has not achieved its objectives, paying particular attention to marginalised groups.
The panel explores how a polycentric approach can effectively address the challenges posed by a diverse and dynamic entity like water governance. Specifically in irrigation, resource self governance and participation has to navigate local cultures and traditions, power dynamics, and manage interdependencies amongst stakeholders. Together with other approaches, the panel aims to build a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between civic participation, environmental change, and irrigation systems. This panel builds on an existing body of literature that emphasizes the need for water governance systems in the context of current dynamic institutional and environmental change.
The evolving institutional change has resulted in shifts in policy priorities, changes in government structures, and the emergence of new actors and stakeholders. The panel recognizes the need to explore how these institutional dynamics influence the effectiveness of water governance and how they can be harnessed to address water-related challenges more efficiently.
The state plays an indispensable role in policy-making to govern the commons, collective action, and formal and informal institutions in postcolonial societies. To overcome socio-ecological crises, the state uses public policy as a tool to manage and govern the commons, thereby often limiting citizens’ capacity to access these commons.
In the analysis of interactions between state, citizens, and non-state actors in policy processes, the role of power is emerging as an important factor in understanding these complex set-ups. Explicit considerations of power may reveal underlying colonial continuities, entrenched power asymmetries, and persisting inequalities that cut across social, economic, and political arenas and affect the decision-making processes and institutions under investigation. However, emerging approaches to conceptualising power are yet to find broad application in policy and institutional anlyses.
In this panel, we invite contributions that draw on postcolonial, decolonial, and subaltern theorizations or framings to integrate critical reflections on power in their public policy analysis of commons governance.
Small-scale irrigation in India have complex institutional and resource structures. These systems serve as adaptive strategies for vulnerable communities during droughts when large-scale irrigation fails, while also enabling collectivization and representation. To establish this finding, the paper uses a polycentric framework to study a traditional community-owned small-scale irrigation system called Gonchi in Anantapur District of Andhra Pradesh, India. This study employs a case study methodology, utilizing qualitative tools to analyze discourses and narratives about this small-scale irrigation system within the prevailing policy push for large-scale state driven irrigation. The findings reveal that Gonchi serves as a collective platform for advocacy and representation for small farmers. However, insufficient attention is given to ensuring justice for women and farm labour.
Forests and forest governing systems are embedded in political ecology, where the perception and value of a forest vary across different perspectives and influence governing practices to conserve forests and sustainably use its resources. From the gender perspective, the literature demonstrates that different roles and positions women and men occupy in forest governance are significantly shaped by their everyday dependency on forests and their socio-economic and cultural position.
In Odisha, women and girls from Adivasi communities, particularly Kondh Adivasis, bear the responsibility of the household and contribute to the auxiliary activities in agriculture and animal husbandry. Due to these responsibilities and limited mobility perpetuated by socio-cultural norms, they extensively depend on forests to sustain their households. Hence, women actively participate in local governance systems such as ‘Thengapalli’, a rotational patrolling system.
Socio-cultural norms continue to limit the decision-making power of women in forest governing institutions and undermine the knowledge they possess. Therefore, this study examines the ways local knowledge held by Kondh women is integrated into decision-making in forest governing systems. Parallelly, explore the challenges women face. We examine the case study of Thengapalli in Gundurabari, Nayagarh district, India. To analyze the data we adopt the framework on the success of community practices for natural resource protection by Chaiphar et al., (2013), and Gopalam & Reddy (2006). The framework is based on Lave & Wenger's (1991) community of practices (CoPs), that emerge when individuals share knowledge and expertise to attain a common goal at different scales. This collective knowledge encompasses long-term observations, local wisdom, human behaviour, and ecological and social characteristics.
Our analysis illustrates the integration of women’s local knowledge into practice in forest governance which is evident in how women utilize their understanding of the forest condition, human behaviour within the governing system and household needs to guide decision-making. Socio-cultural stratification such as caste, internal conflicts, the practice of ostracization, and belief systems add layers of complexities to women-led governing systems. These factors continue to affect the longevity of forest governing institutions and knowledge circulation.
© 2025 | Privacy & Cookies Policy